Start Submission

Reading: Re-Envisioning Global Health Competencies for the African Region Aligned with Local Health N...

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Original Research

Re-Envisioning Global Health Competencies for the African Region Aligned with Local Health Needs and Resources

Authors:

Ritika Tiwari ,

Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town, PO Box 241, Cape Town, 8000, ZA
About Ritika

PhD, MBA, BSc (Hons)

X close

René English,

Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town, PO Box 241, Cape Town, 8000, ZA
About René

MBCHB, MMed, FCPHM(SA), PhD

X close

Kerrin Begg,

Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town, PO Box 241, Cape Town, 8000, ZA
About Kerrin

MBCHB, FCPHM(SA)

X close

Usuf Chikte

Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town, PO Box 241, Cape Town, 8000, ZA
About Usuf

PhD, MSc, MDent, DHSM, BChD

X close

Abstract

Background: While many Global Health programs aim to address health inequalities within and between HICs and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) there is a need to establish new Global Health academic programs within the growing trend towards ‘internationalization of higher education’.

Objective: This study was undertaken to re-envision Global Health competencies for the African region context with respect to the local health needs and availability of resources.

Methods: This study was undertaken over a period of four years from 2017 till 2020. A three-pronged strategy was undertaken to scan, scope, distil and develop a set of Global Health domains and competencies for the African region. Strategy 1 encompassed an environmental scan of Global Health competencies (2017–2019), and a literature review (2017–2020); strategy 2 comprised a scoping of education programs in Global Health (2018–2019); and strategy 3 involved an interest-group discussion in a face-to-face conference.

Findings: Seven core and four cross-cutting global health competency statements were developed for the African region. The core competency statements included following domains: global health systems and international relations; global evidence ecosystem; role of international organizations; universal health issues; intellectual property rights; responses to issues affecting different at-risk groups; local, national, and international policy and economic context affecting global health. The four cross-cutting competency statements included following domains: digital and academic literacies; quantitative and qualitative research; policy and funding allocation resources; ethical conduct of global health practice and research global health.

Conclusion: There is a need to enable higher education institutions (HEIs) from the Global South to offer global health qualifications with a set of competencies that better approximate solutions to contextualised problems – not only to students from the Global South but also from the Global North. The global health competencies developed in this research study will enable African HEIs to offer global health education in a more pragmatic manner.

How to Cite: Tiwari, R., English, R., Begg, K. and Chikte, U., 2022. Re-Envisioning Global Health Competencies for the African Region Aligned with Local Health Needs and Resources. Annals of Global Health, 88(1), p.90. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3844
73
Views
4
Downloads
3
Twitter
  Published on 20 Oct 2022
 Accepted on 03 Oct 2022            Submitted on 10 May 2022

Introduction

In 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) celebrated the World Health Worker Week 2022 – ‘Build the Health Workforce Back Better’ [1]. The theme emphasized on investing in competency-based education for achieving universal health coverage. The term ‘competency’ is sometimes used interchangeably with competence. In literature, at times the term ‘competences’ is used, and at times ‘competency’ or the plural ‘competencies’, but all of these expressions are generally applied towards the same end, that of defining the set of attributes that individuals should possess, or functions that they must be able to do, within their sphere of operation.

A clear and simple definition of competencies has been offered by Bartram et al. as ‘sets of behaviors that are instrumental in the delivery of results’ [2]. In this Universal Competency Framework they make a distinction between competencies (as sets of desirable behaviors); competency potential (individual attributes necessary for someone to produce the desired behaviors); competency requirements (demands made upon individuals in a work setting to behave in certain ways and not in others); and results (actual or intended outcomes of behavior, which have been defined either explicitly or implicitly by the individual, his or her line manager or the organization [2].

According to Khan and Ramachandran, competency refers to the skill itself, and competence to the ability to perform the skill [3]. Another distinction that has been made is the competence primarily concerns the performance requirements of the job, and competencies concern what the job holder brings to the job and encompasses behavior, attitudes, values, ethics [4]. For realizing the true value and potential of competency – ‘alternative lenses’ will need to emerge that may provide developmental support for all arms of a profession—educators, regulators, employers, practitioners, and so forth [5]. The term ‘global health’ has been defined by Koplan et al. as ‘an area for study, research, and practice that places a priority on improving health and achieving health equity for all people worldwide’. This definition focusses on ‘health improvement and health equity’ [6]. Over the last decade, the research work around global health has grown multifold. Apart from university consortiums and professional associations, academic institutions are also exploring the scope of their global health educational programs to meet the demand for a ‘qualified, skilled and competent’ global health professional. Recent research on global health competencies includes the work undertaken by Consortium of Universities of Global Health [7], Association of Schools of Public Health (ASPH) [8], Association of Pacific Rim Universities [9], UK’s Global Health Curriculum Group (GHCG) [10], Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research [11], Global Health Education Consortium (GHEC) and the Association of Faculties of Medicine (AFMC) of Canada’s Global Health Resource Group (GHRG) [12]. However, this exercise of defining competency frameworks/sets has become a one-sided process oblivious to contexts of global health that is ‘health improvement and health equity’ [13]. Additionally, there are several other research studies which is centered around Global Health competencies for UK health professionals [14], for Postgraduate Public Health Education (based on HICs) [15], and for 21st-Century Health Professionals (undertaken by CUGH a Global Health Competency Subcommittee) [16]. Nine core global health research mentoring competencies were also identified for Individuals and Institutions in LMICs [17].

The process of developing the domains and competency statements for global health has been frequently driven in agreement with programs in high income countries (HICs) [13]. This unfortunately has often failed to adequately include the experiences and views of health professionals working in low-income countries (LICs); lower middle-income countries (LMICs) and upper middle-income countries (UMICs). While many global health programs aim to address health inequalities between HICs and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [18], there is a need to set the new global health academic programs within the growing trend towards the ‘internationalization of higher education’ [19].

The prevailing focus of the global health programs, dominant in the Global North, is largely about health needs of LMICs, improvement of health worldwide, reduction of disparities, and protection of societies against global threats that disregard national boundaries. It is essential that governments and academic institutions in LMICs, and the Global South in particular, should be engaging on an equal footing towards the development of a mutual understanding of the scope of global health with a shared education, research, and implementation agenda for global health.

Africa can be seen as different from the rest of the world, even from other developing countries which are also affected by the emergence and reemergence of diseases, given that Africa is still threatened by the world’s most acute public health threats, despite medical advancements. Africa accounts for 67% of the global total of new HIV infections [20], 95% of malaria cases [21] and 36% of all TB deaths [22]. Regionally, Africa continues to have the highest rate of under-five mortality and maternal mortality ratio in the world [23]. Despite of having high burden of diseases, Africa can also help other countries learn about epidemic response from its past experiences such as Ebola, Marburg, Yellow Fever and now COVID-19 [24].

As we know, health is also impacted by several variables such as conditions of employment, housing, income, access to education, health, and other critical life resources – which are either unavailable or insufficient in African countries. The work of African scientists – who are working within African region, is often designed through their own lived experiences and gained local knowledge yet major research funding is awarded to HIC institutions as primary recipients [25, 26]. Thus, there is a felt need to re-envision global health competencies with respect to the local health needs and availability of resources. In this study we have attempted to find the answer for three questions related to global health competencies within Africa’s context, that is, ‘where are we?’, ‘what is being done?’, and ‘what should be done?’. This study can be used as a framework for other lower and middle-income countries for developing competencies for global health within the context of their needs and resources. The findings in this study could serve as a stepping-stone towards building a competent and strong global health workforce which will be seen as an equal and included within the global health community for research and practice.

Materials and Methods

This study was undertaken over a period of four years from 2017 to 2020. A three-pronged strategy was undertaken to scan, scope, distil and develop a set of global health domains and competencies for the African region (Figure 1).

Methodology used for developing global health competencies
Figure 1 

Methodology for developing global health competencies.

As part of the first strategy, an environmental scan of global health competencies was undertaken, where the definition, research focus, engagement of BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) and LMICs, and the focus of African institutions for global health were described. A literature review was undertaken from 2017 to 2020 to locate the research focusing on global health in terms of study design, definition, curricula, engagement of LMICs in global health and the focus of African institutions on global health. This activity included development of a search strategy for electronic databases, identifying key journals for hand searching, internet searches of key sites and reference checking. Key words such as ‘global health research definitions’, ‘educational curricula’, ‘engagement of BRICS and LMICs’ were searched in electronic bibliographic databases and registers, hand searches, reference checking and internet searches. This activity helped in conceptualizing ‘where are we?’ – referring to Africa in the context of global health.

As a second strategy, a scoping review of educational programs in global health was undertaken as a desk review. This exercise was a systematic mapping of Master’s in global health programs offered worldwide during 2018–19. In this exercise, geographical distribution of the programs, types of degrees being offered, eligibility/entrance requirements/criteria, delivery (in-person or online), components of the programs, core courses, duration, format (fulltime or part-time), cost and tuition fee were reviewed. Information was also collected regarding career paths of Master’s in Global Health graduates by searching career information as mentioned on websites of universities in Canada, United States of America, Rwanda, and Switzerland. Brief information regarding undergraduate programs in global health was also collected. Four websites were identified that claimed to present the ‘top’ or ‘best’ programs such as www.mphonline.org, www.best-masters.com, www.healthcarestudies.com, and www.postgrad.com. Global health programs from these websites were used to begin to populate an initial spreadsheet of programs. The spreadsheet was further populated after searching for global health programs at universities known to be involved in global health using Google search engine. Once the global health programs were identified details about each program were collected from the university websites. This activity helped in understanding ‘what is being done’ – with respect to Africa in the context of global health.

For the third strategy, competency statements in Africa’s context for global health were developed as part of an interest group discussion. The interest group discussion was undertaken with the participants (who registered for the session on global health competencies) at a public health conference held in South Africa in 2019. The list of core competencies was drafted during the interest group discussion which was facilitated by one of the authors. The discussions in the interest group were aided by providing the group with frameworks and reference materials for drafting competencies [7, 27, B28]. Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives framework was also used to draft global health competencies [29]. The groups also had access to the results of the environmental scan of global health competencies (as mentioned in first strategy). The interest group predominantly comprised of academics and public health professionals within Africa. The profiles of these participants are included in Supplementary Table 1.

Finalizing competency statements: Discussion and consensus building exercise was subsequently undertaken wherein the competency statements were revised to avoid duplication or overlap of core competency statements until consensus was reached by the authors. This activity also helped in planning ‘what should be done’ – with respect to global health programs and their competencies in Africa from researchers’ and professionals’ perspective. The summary of methods undertaken for this study over four years have been listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Summary of methodology.


METHODOLOGY SOURCE OF INFORMATION NUMBERS

Literature review Electronic bibliographic databases and registers 9 970

Hand searches 82

Reference checking 315

Internet searches 19

Scoping exercise Global health programs related websites reviewed 4

Institute/university websites reviewed 73

Interest Group Discussion Participants 31

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Stellenbosch University Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC Reference No: X20/05/022). Verbal consent was obtained from the participants of the conference workshop.

Results

The results developed from these three strategies have been listed in this section.

Literature review of global health competencies: Out of 10 386 citations, 116 global health research studies were included in the review (Supplementary Table 2). The review found that majority of the studies were conducted in the United States of America (USA); 62 for USA most studies focused on education; most research methodology was exploratory and curriculum-based; Africa as a continent and United Kingdom as a country have the same number of global health research studies conducted; 16 each LMICs and BRICS have the lowest classification with regards to global health research.

The term ‘education program in global health’ is broad as it varies from medicine (this includes but not limited to global health residency tracks in various medical specialties, undergraduate and postgraduate programs), nursing, public health, physician assistant, anthropology, and mental health residency programs in various institutions. Although most of the studies included in this review focused predominantly on education, not all detailed their educational curriculum. Some concentrated on the partnership between medical faculty and students, while others were focused on ethics and rotation of global health track students [30, 31, 32, 33, 34]. The various curricula were either didactic or experiential learning, which involved peer education or mentoring in domestic and international settings. They were primarily targeted at medical students, clinical specialties, doctors, and residents. The core competencies of global health curriculum specificity vary and still require the necessary harmonization for capacity building for poverty reduction and improved well-being.

Scoping of educational programs in global health: The scoping exercise of Master’s level global health programs identified 73 programs on five continents: North America [33]; Europe [23]; Asia [9]; Australasia [4]; and Africa [3]. Whereas one program was offered in partnership between a university in China and the USA; and one in online mode (which can be best described to be multi-country/international/global) [1]. Seventy-seven (77%) percent of the programs identified are offered by universities in Europe and North America, with 29 (40%) offered by universities in the USA. This scoping does not include all global health Master’s programs.

Some universities have more than one type or stream of global health Master’s program. A wide range of degrees are offered in global health including an MPhil in Global Health, although the most common ones are Master of Public Health (MPH) and Master of Science (MSc) programs. A few of the programs identified in the review focus on global health diplomacy or global health leadership. The specific terminology varied to a considerable degree, including ‘MPH in Global Health’ and ‘MPH with a concentration in Global Health.’ Most programs appeared to be professional degrees (e.g., MPH), although a number of research focused programs (e.g., MSc) were identified, however not all MSc in Global Health programs were found to be research focused.

Set of competency statements developed in interest group discussion exercise: The list of competency statements for global health within the African context that were agreed upon by the interest group is provided in Figure 2.

Competency statements developed for global health within the Africa context
Figure 2 

Competency statements for global health within the Africa context.

Discussion

Global health is a field of scholarship and practice seeking to advance health equity by employing a transdisciplinary, inter-sectoral and collaborative approach to address complex health and social problems that cross-national borders and are impacted by transnational forces [35]. In practice, the Global North has been dominant in directing and setting competency guidelines for the global health community [36]. However, times are changing and equal representation of the voice of the Global South and LMICs should be ensured and evidenced in major global health associations increasingly developing these competencies and guidelines.

In 2012, global health competencies for nurses in the Americas were developed to guide faculty deliberations about global health competencies that should be incorporated in the nursing curricula [37]. Similarly, the global health community in Africa needs to develop and adopt a global health competency framework tailored to the needs of Africa. In 2014, the University of Global Health Equity was established in Kigali, Rwanda – to advance global health delivery, and to train a new generation of global health leaders who are equipped in not just building, but sustaining effective and equitable health systems [38]. Such initiatives are needed in greater numbers in African region.

Currently, there are no imperatives or incentives for departments/universities that offer global health programs in the African region/LMICs to collaborate or share resources. Most of the public health/community health/global health departments effectively function in isolation in Africa. A culture of collaboration among these departments would encourage a sharing of best practices in tuition, scholarships, curriculum development, widening the faculty resource pool and placement & internship opportunities for global health graduates. Currently, global health graduates are employed in public, private and nongovernmental sectors, in teaching, research, consulting and implementation roles. However, there are no well-defined career pathways for global health graduates, which is a significant barrier for interested candidates who wish to undertake these courses and work in the global health sector.

We reviewed the match of the global health competency statements developed within the African context with the recently published research articles by Jacobsen et al. for undergraduate minors in global health [39], and postgraduate Master of Science (MSc) and Master of Arts (MA) Degrees in Global Health [40] (Table 2) – as this research work focusses on undergraduate and postgraduate programs in Africa. For undergraduate minors three competencies viz., detail and analyse global health systems and international relations; evaluate the local, national and international policy and economic context as it affects global health; identify and detail resources and opportunities, and influence policy and funding allocation – were observed to be matching. For Master’s degrees in global health four competency statements viz., detail and analyse global health systems and international relations; evaluate the local, national and international policy and economic context as it affects global health; identify, analyse and develop a response to issues that affect universal health issues; identify, analyse and develop appropriate responses to issues affecting different at-risk groups (including refugees, migrants and vulnerable groups of population) – were found to be matching.

Table 2

Match of the global health competency statements developed within African context with recently published research studies in 2020.


COMPETENCY STATEMENTS FOR GLOBAL HEALTH WITHIN THE AFRICAN CONTEXT JACOBSEN ET AL. (2020) – UNDERGRADUATE MINORS IN GLOBAL HEALTH JACOBSEN ET AL. (2020) – MS AND MA DEGREES IN GLOBAL HEALTH

Core Competencies:

1. Detail and analyse global health systems and international relations x x

2. Describe the global evidence ecosystem (research evidence in global health)

3. Identify the role of international organizations in global health

4. Evaluate the local, national and international policy and economic context as it affects global health x x

5. Identify, analyse and develop a response to issues that affect universal health issues x

6. Identify, analyse and develop appropriate responses to issues affecting different at-risk groups (including refugees, migrants and vulnerable groups of population) x

7. Identify, appraise and formulate responses to the issues related to intellectual property rights (TRIPS etc.) within the context of global health

Cross-cutting/intersectoral competencies:

1. Demonstrate digital and academic literacies

2. Undertake quantitative as well as qualitative research

3. Identify and detail resources and opportunities, and influence policy and funding allocation. x

4. Identify and apply appropriate principles and guidelines to ensure ethical conduct of global health practice and research

Key: x: covered, –: not covered.

Source: Author’s own.

Our work has a few limitations. In this review we mainly focused on global health competencies within the African context and have not detailed sub-competencies, nor undertaken a more detailed analysis of the depth of the identified competency domains. We plan to conduct the detailed analysis in the context of depth of global health competency domains for both undergraduate and postgraduate students. For the interest group discussion most participants came from universities based in South Africa with some participants from other African countries. However, this was not an absolute representative sample for whole of African region.

Within Africa there are five distinct regions, that is, West, East, North, Southern and Central. Countries that deem themselves developed also need to learn from others, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic [41]. Countries of the Global South need capacity strengthening while those in the North are assumed to have a strong capacity regardless of any health issues [25].

Conclusion

The majority (92.7%) of the global/international health programs are offered in North America, Europe and the Western Pacific region [42]. Traditionally, global health expertise and thus research flows from the Global North to Global South and this is reflected in research, training and technical assistance. Thus, there is a need for developing a more explicit lens around global health competencies for the African region. Education needs for global health students are different for African institutions as compared to other developed regions of the world. We hope that the concept of this research study can be used for developing global health competencies in other regions/countries of the world.

There is a need to enable Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) from the Global South to offer global health qualifications with a set of competencies that better approximate solutions to contextualised problems– not only for students from the Global South but also from Global North. The global health competencies developed in this research study will enable African HEIs to offer global health education in a more pragmatic manner.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 1

Profiles of participants in interest group exercise undertaken in public health conference organized by PHASA in South Africa in 2019.


SR. NO. AFFILIATION AGE GROUP COUNTRY OF ORIGIN

1 Stellenbosch University 46–65 South Africa

2 Stellenbosch University >25 South Africa

3 Stellenbosch University 46–65 South Africa

4 Stellenbosch University 26–35 Zimbabwe

5 Stellenbosch University >25 Malawi

6 Stellenbosch University 26–35 Nigeria

7 Teaching Nations 46–65 South Africa

8 Teaching Nations 46–65 South Africa

9 Stellenbosch University 26–35 South Africa

10 Stellenbosch University 36–45 Nigeria

11 Stellenbosch University 46–65 South Africa

12 Stellenbosch University 36–45 South Africa

13 Stellenbosch University 46–65 South Africa

14 Stellenbosch University >25 South Africa

15 Stellenbosch University 36–45 South Africa

16 Stellenbosch University 26–35 South Africa

17 Health Systems Trust 46–65 South Africa

18 Health Systems Trust 46–65 South Africa

19 University of Western Cape 46–65 South Africa

20 Stellenbosch University >25 South Africa

21 Stellenbosch University >25 Belgium

22 University of Cape Town 26–35 South Africa

23 Stellenbosch University 26–35 South Africa

24 University of Cape Town 26–35 South Africa

25 Stellenbosch University 46–65 South Africa

26 University of Cape Town 26–35 South Africa

27 University of Witwatersrand 26–35 South Africa

28 USAID TB Project 26–35 South Africa

29 University of Witwatersrand 36–45 Ghana

30 National Department of Health, South Africa 46–65 South Africa

31 Raleigh Fitkin Memorial Hospital 36–45 Swaziland

32 University of KwaZulu Natal 36–45 South Africa

Supplementary Table 2

Search strategy.


NUMBER SEARCH CRITERIA

10 386 citations

8 274 on account of duplicates

3 134 screening the titles, remained

1 452 abstracts were obtained

542 (59.5%) met inclusion criteria

910 Full reports were obtained of 910

184 726 excluded (editorials, commentaries, conferences…)

35 studies not retrieved – unavailable at libraries

28 excluded with reasons

116 classified Type A studies & reported on

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Esther F Adebayo, Dr Charles Shey Wiysonge – for developing the scoping review report in 2017; Dr Aaron Yarmoshuk – for undertaking the global mapping of health sciences Master’s in Global Health programs in 2018–19. We would also like to thank The Public Health Association of South Africa (PHASA) for conducting the session on global health competencies in their conference in 2019.

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Authors Contributions

UC and RT led the conceptualization and writing of the various drafts of the manuscript. All authors conducted the research. All authors assisted with editorial and conceptualization of the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

References

  1. World Health Organization. World Health Worker Week: Investing in competency-based education for UHC Geneva2022. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2022/04/04/default-calendar/whww2022_education. 

  2. Bartram D, Robertson IT, Callinan M. Introduction: A framework for examining organizational effectiveness. Organizational effectiveness: The role of psychology. 2002; 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696736.ch 

  3. Khan K, Ramachandran S. Conceptual framework for performance assessment: competency, competence and performance in the context of assessments in healthcare–deciphering the terminology. Medical Teacher. 2012; 34(11): 920–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.722707 

  4. Cheng MI, Dainty AR, Moore DR. What makes a good project manager? Human Resource Management Journal. 2005; 15(1): 25–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00138.x 

  5. Austin Z. Competency and its many meanings. Pharmacy. 2019; 7(2): 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy7020037 

  6. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, Reddy KS, Rodriguez MH, Sewankambo NK, et al. Towards a common definition of global health. The Lancet. 2009; 373(9679): 1993–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60332-9 

  7. Consortium of Universities for Global Health (CUGH) Competency Sub-Committee. Global Health Education Competencies tool kit (2nd edition). Washington, DC: CUGH; 2018. 

  8. Association of Schools of Public Health (ASPH). Global Health Competency Model: ASPH; 2011. Accessed June 23, 2020. https://www.publichealth.pitt.edu/Portals/0/Main/ASPH%20GH%20Competencies.pdf. 

  9. Withers M, Lin H-H, Schmidt T, Delos Trinos JPCR, Kumar S. Establishing competencies for a global health workforce: Recommendations from the Association of Pacific Rim Universities. Annals of Global Health. 2019; 85(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.32 

  10. Walpole SC, Shortall C, van Schalkwyk MC, Merriel A, Ellis J, Obolensky L, et al. Time to go global: a consultation on global health competencies for postgraduate doctors. International Health. 2016; 8(5): 317–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihw019 

  11. Cole DC, Davison C, Hanson L, Jackson SF, Page A, Lencucha R, et al. Being global in public health practice and research: complementary competencies are needed. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2011; 102(5): 394–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404183 

  12. Brewer TF, Saba N, Clair V. From boutique to basic: a call for standardised medical education in global health. Medical Education. 2009; 43(10): 930–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03458.x 

  13. Eichbaum Q. The problem with competencies in global health education. Academic Medicine. 2015; 90(4): 414–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000665 

  14. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Global Health Competencies for UK Health Professionals; 2016. 

  15. Sawleshwarkar S, Negin J. A review of global health competencies for postgraduate public health education. Frontiers in Public Health. 2017; 5: 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00046 

  16. Jogerst K, Callender B, Adams V, Evert J, Fields E, Hall T, et al. Identifying interprofessional global health competencies for 21st-century health professionals. Annals of Global Health. 2015; 81(2): 239–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.03.006 

  17. Hamer DH, Hansoti B, Prabhakaran D, Huffman MD, Nxumalo N, Fox MP, et al. Global health research mentoring competencies for individuals and institutions in low-and middle-income countries. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2019; 100(1 Suppl): 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0558 

  18. Yarmoshuk AN, Cole DC, Guantai AN, Mwangu M, Zarowsky C. The international partner universities of East African health professional programmes: Why do they do it and what do they value? Globalization and Health. 2019; 15(1): 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0477-7 

  19. Macfarlane SB, Jacobs M, Kaaya EE. In the name of global health: trends in academic institutions. Journal of Public Health Policy. 2008; 29(4): 383–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2008.25 

  20. Wazir Z. Africa Battles Vaccine Inequity, New Variants and HIV Simultaneously: US News; 2022. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2022-01-13/africa-battles-2-pandemics-simultaneously-covid-19-and-hiv. 

  21. World Health Organization. Malaria Geneva2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malaria. 

  22. World Health Organization. World TB Day 2022 Geneva: WHo; 2022. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://www.afro.who.int/regional-director/speeches-messages/world-tb-day-2022. 

  23. Sharrow D, Hug L, You D, Alkema L, Black R, Cousens S, et al. Global, regional, and national trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2019 with scenario-based projections until 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. The Lancet Global Health. 2022; 10(2): e195–e206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00515-5 

  24. Dennis A, Thomas K. Learning about epidemic response from sub-Saharan African countries: Statnews.com; 2020. Accessed June 24, 2020. https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/09/learning-about-epidemic-response-from-african-countries/. 

  25. Khan T, Abimbola S, Kyobutungi C, Pai M. How we classify countries and people—and why it matters. BMJ Specialist Journals. 2022; e009704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009704 

  26. Erondu NA, Aniebo I, Kyobutungi C, Midega J, Okiro E, Okumu F. Open letter to international funders of science and development in Africa. Nature Medicine. 2021 May; 27(5): 742–4. PubMed PMID: 33859410. Pubmed Central PMCID: 7613536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01307-8 

  27. Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH). MPH Global Health Concentration Competencies Toolkit. ASPPH; 2018. 

  28. Wilson L, Callender B, Hall TL, Jogerst K, Torres H, Velji A. Identifying global health competencies to prepare 21st century global health professionals: report from the global health competency subcommittee of the consortium of universities for global health. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2014; 42(2_suppl): 26–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12184 

  29. Bloom B. Bloom’s Taxonomy 1956. https://bloomstaxonomy.net/. 

  30. Kerry VB, Walensky RP, Tsai AC, Bergmark RW, Bergmark BA, Rouse C, et al. US medical specialty global health training and the global burden of disease. Journal of Global Health. 2013 Dec; 3(2): 020406. PubMed PMID: 24363924. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3868823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.03.020406 

  31. Macfarlane SB, Agabian N, Novotny TE, Rutherford GW, Stewart CC, Debas HT. Think globally, act locally, and collaborate internationally: global health sciences at the University of California, San Francisco. Acad Med. 2008 February; 83(2): 173–9. PubMed PMID: 18303363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31816096e3 

  32. Liu Y, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Wang J. Gaps in studies of global health education: an empirical literature review. Glob Health Action. 2015; 8: 25709. PubMed PMID: 25906768. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4408318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.25709 

  33. Dotchin C, van den Ende C, Walker R. Delivering global health teaching: the development of a global health option. The Clinical Teacher. 2010 December; 7(4): 271–5. PubMed PMID: 21134205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00394.x 

  34. Drain PK, Primack A, Hunt DD, Fawzi WW, Holmes KK, Gardner P. Global health in medical education: a call for more training and opportunities. Acad Med. 2007 March; 82(3): 226–30. PubMed PMID: 17327707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180305cf9 

  35. Department of Global Health. Global Health is South Africa: Stellenbosch University; 2017. Accessed April 20, 2022. http://www.sun.ac.za/english/faculty/healthsciences/global-health. 

  36. Svadzian A, Vasquez NA, Abimbola S, Pai M. Global health degrees: at what cost? BMJ Specialist Journals. 2020; e003310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003310 

  37. Wilson L, Harper DC, Tami-Maury I, Zarate R, Salas S, Farley J, et al. Global health competencies for nurses in the Americas. Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. 2012 July–August; 28(4): 213–22. PubMed PMID: 22818191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.11.021 

  38. University of Global Health Equity. Our Story Rwanda: UGHE; 2020. Accessed June 25, 2020. https://ughe.org/the-story-behind-the-university/. 

  39. Jacobsen KH, Hay MC, Manske J, Waggett CE. Curricular Models and Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Minors in Global Health. Annals of Global Health. 2020; 86(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2963 

  40. Jacobsen KH, Li X, Gartin M, Malouin RA, Waggett CE. Master of Science (MS) and Master of Arts (MA) degrees in global health: Applying interdisciplinary research skills to the study of globalization-related health disparities. Pedagogy in Health Promotion. 2020; 6(1): 14–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379919895032 

  41. Dalglish SL. COVID-19 gives the lie to global health expertise. The Lancet. 2020; 395(10231): 1189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30739-X 

  42. Svadzian A, Vasquez NA, Abimbola S, Pai M. Global health degrees: at what cost? BMJ Specialist Journals; 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003310